Wednesday, 5 December 2012

Shifting Media's Agenda from politics to People

Photo Courtesy: Google

“Politics, politics and politics, I am fed up, what the hell our News TV channels are doing, don’t they have other social responsibilities except giving marathon coverage to dirty politics”, said Hamza Ali,23, one of the university students who were having discussion on media’s role in the society.

There has been electronic media expansion and explosion in our country since the turn of the 21st century with more than 80 TV channels disseminating an influx of information to millions of viewers.

The expansion is good but Mr. Ali, who is studying Journalism and Mass Communication in Islamic International University Islamabad, has rightly raised questions whether the media is fulfilling its functions in society as a responsible actor? Does it regulate and improve itself to be more responsible with the speed it expanded and is expanding? Is it playing its role as the fourth pillar of state and a watchdog of the society?

However, unfortunately, Pakistani media is neither responsible nor people-centric. Prime significance is given to political issues. Over 150 televised talk shows telecasted every day during the prime hours have set their agenda to discuss nothing but so-called political issues.

Moreover, these shows are overcrowded with politicians who deceive the nation with hollow slogans and traditional rhetoric. Politicians have nothing to do with problems; they are concerned only about their political gains and scorings.

Pakistan is in a quagmire of crises. Thus media definitely have something that deserves to be highlighted in the media beyond "dirty politics". Then, why don’t the media divert its focus from politics to people? Why not to give more coverage to social issues?

Media managers have to reprioritize their agenda as ambassadors of Pakistan, a link between government and people of Pakistan and a national image builder, before it is too late to regain its credibility.

Tuesday, 4 December 2012

Why to Shop Online..?

Photo Courtesy: Google


This is the age of Internet which has brought world into our bedrooms and offices. Things are just a click away. With development of the technology new trends are being set.

Online Shopping is one such trend becoming more and more popular every passing day. People are using the Web to shop for a variety of items ranging from blankets to shoes and from cellphones to airplane tickets and what not. Besides some disadvantages, Online Shopping offers many advantages.

Shop anything anytime
Online shoppers can choose any time of the day or night to get on the Web and shop. They need not to worry about inclement weather, wait for taxi or opening of the market. Even some people are home-bound so they can buy thing sitting in their homes.

Online market is very wide
Online shopping also offers wide range sellers. Online market is unending. One can move to another vendor easily and quickly. Moreover, it also provides the chance to compare prices from hundreds of different vendors.

Informed purchases
Another advantage is it’s easy to access consumer reviews for pretty much any product one can think of online, which makes for more informed purchases.

No Sales Pressure
Online shopping also makes people free from pressure of sales. We've all been awkwardly propositioned by eager salespeople. One doesn't have to put up with that online.

What can deter buyers to buy online?
It is, however, rightly said that a coin has two faces. The online shopping is not the different too. It has disadvantages too.

One can’t try things on. If, for example, one intends to buy a clothing item, he/she doesn’t have the ability to feel the material, try it on, and see how it's made.

When a customer wants to talk to seller immediately, he/she may have to wait for a quite long time to get his/her question answered.

Internet is insecure, non-personal
Privacy and security are legitimate concerns for any online shopper, but there are precautions you can take to make sure your transaction is a safe one.

Sunday, 2 December 2012

Know your Rights Please!

Human Rights in US
The protection of fundamental human rights was a foundation stone in the establishment of the United States over 200 years ago. Since then, a central goal of U.S. foreign policy has been the promotion of respect for human rights, as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The United States understands that the existence of human rights helps secure the peace, deter aggression, promote the rule of law, combat crime and corruption, strengthen democracies, and prevent humanitarian crises.


Because the promotion of human rights is an important national interest, the United States seeks to:
Hold governments accountable to their obligations under universal human rights norms and international human rights instruments;
Promote greater respect for human rights, including freedom from torture, freedom of expression, press freedom, women's rights, children's rights, and the protection of minorities;
Promote the rule of law, seek accountability, and change cultures of impunity;
Assist efforts to reform and strengthen the institutional capacity of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Commission on Human Rights; and
Coordinate human rights activities with important allies, including the EU, and regional organizations.


The Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) applies three key principlesto its work on human rights:
First, DRL strives to learn the truth and state the facts in all of its human rights investigations, reports on country conditions, speeches and votes in the UN, and asylum profiles. Each year, DRL develops, edits, and submits to Congress a 5,000-page report on human rights conditions in over 190 countries that is respected globally for its objectivity and accuracy. DRL also provides relevant information on country conditions to the Immigration and Naturalization Service and immigration judges in asylum cases.

Second, DRL takes consistent positions concerning past, present, and future abuses. With regard to past abuses, it actively promotes accountability. To stop ongoing abuses, the bureau uses an "inside-outside" approach that combines vigorous, external focus on human rights concerns (including the possibility of sanctions) with equally robust support for internal reform. To prevent future abuses, it promotes early warning and preventive diplomacy. Each year DRL ensures that human rights considerations are incorporated into U.S. military training and security assistance programs; promotes the rights of women through international campaigns for political participation and full equality; conducts high-level human rights dialogues with other governments; coordinates U.S. policy on human rights with key allies; and raises key issues and cases through diplomatic and public channels.

Third, DRL forges and maintains partnerships with organizations, governments, and multilateral institutions committed to human rights. The bureau takes advantage of multilateral fora to focus international attention on human rights problems and to seek correction. Each year, DRL provides significant technical, financial, or staff support for U.S. delegations to the annual meetings of several international human rights organizations; conducts regular consultations with Native American tribes and serves as the Secretary's principal advisor on international indigenous rights issues; maintains relations with the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights; and supports the creation of effective multilateral human rights mechanisms and institutions for accountability.

Monday, 26 November 2012

Sexual, physical and mental abuse in military!

Australia apologizes to victims of abuse   

Defence minister acknowledges sexual, physical and mental abuse in the military after report lists 775 cases since 1951.

Defence Minister Smith said a taskforce would rule on compensation of up to $52,200 for victims [File:AFP]

Australia's government has apologised to hundreds of victims of abuse within the military, clearing the way for victims to receive compensation.

In an address to parliament on Monday, Stephen Smith, defence minister, acknowledged that soldiers, sailors and member of the air force had suffered abuse, often by superiors under the excuse of toughening up younger recruits, since the early 1950s.

"Young men and women have endured sexual, physical or mental abuse from their colleagues which is not acceptable and does not reflect the values of a modern, diverse, tolerant Australian society," Smith told parliament.

"On behalf of the government, I say sorry."

An independent report into abuse within the military earlier this year found 775 plausible allegations of sexual, physical
and mental abuse within the armed forces since 1951.

The report detailed 24 allegations of rape that never went to trial.

Smith said senior military leaders were committed to changing a defence force culture which has often turned a blind
eye to abuse and was often hostile to women or those who spoke out or complained about their treatment.

Independent report

The apology follows an independent report sparked by an incident in 2011, when footage of a female defence academy cadet having consensual sex with a male colleague was streamed online to other cadets without her knowledge.

"That at the time, was said to be an isolated incident," Al Jazeera's Andrew Thomas, reporting from Sydney, said.

"But very quickly, other people came forward and said similar sorts of abuse had happened to them while they were in the military.

"The government asked a law firm to conduct a review and over 1,000 people came forward, saying they had suffered some form of abuse."

General David Hurley, defence force chief, also apologised, saying he recognised "the damage and suffering that has been caused to some".

The Australian Defence Force has begun addressing these causes through its cultural reform programme," he said.

Smith said an independent task force would now examine specific allegations and rule on compensation of up to A$50,000 ($52,200) for victims. It will also refer matters to police or the military justice system if there is evidence of a crime.

Sunday, 25 November 2012

A voice from Gaza



The voices of Gaza's children


Children in Gaza describe living under Israeli siege and attacks as worse than being in prison.



UN Committee on the Rights of the Child said that recent fighting will result in "deep trauma" for Gaza's youth [Reuters]


BEIT LAHIYA, GAZA - The only protection the Awajaa family has against the Israeli rockets is a thin tarpaulin, stretched out over a small plot of land.

The tent, where they have been living on and off since their house was turned to rubble in the 2008-09 Israeli war on Gaza, is one of the first houses on the border, located a mere few hundred metres away from Israel.

"We are the first people to be attacked, and we are the people who can't escape, as it is just empty lands around us," said 15-year-old Omsiyat, the eldest of seven children.

Omsiyat considers her family and neighbours also to be victims of Israeli aggression, as their proximity to the border forces them to be one of the most vulnerable targets of attacks.

"This is not a victory, because [the Israelis] are destroying Gaza," she said. "Yes, we scared them, but they still inflicted damage on us. This is not how we have a victory.

"We did not get two centimetres from Israel. How is this a victory?"

'I don’t want to die'

The Israeli attacks on Gaza, which lasted eight days and came to an end with an Israeli-instigated ceasefire on Wednesday evening, killed a total of 162 Palestinians, including more than 40 children.

In Omsiyat's opinion, the armed resistance, while having made some achievements, also put civilians in a very dangerous situation, making them the largest casualties of the war.

"We are older than our age because we have to take care of each other in these situations. There are definitely psychological consequences to what has been happening to us."

- Sana Al Daaour, 13

"I don't want to die, and I don't want anyone else to die, and there is a strong possibility we can be killed."

While Gaza is often described as an open-air prison due to the crippling siege imposed by Israel, she says the word "prison" is not enough.

"If there was a stronger word than prison, then this is where we are. In a prison you can move around, here you cannot," she said.

"If you are in a prison, you do not get bombed. Here we are in a prison and we get bombed."

Awajaa, Omsiyat's mother, described how her children would clamber on top of her as the missiles fell around them, too afraid to sleep. Four-year-old Zakriyat would cry all the time, insisting her parents lie next to her.

Ten-year-old Hala spent most of the time under a blanket. Three-year-old Layali would be too afraid to move from the bed to the kitchen for food. Six-year-old Diaa, who suffers from hearing and speech problems as a result of the 2008-09 war, has started wetting the bed.

"Diaa keeps asking if the new home we get will be bombed," she said. "He keeps asking us to tell the Israelis not to hit our new home."

'They were more scared'

For 11-year-old Khadra Al Daaour and her five siblings, the fear and sleepless nights were bearable, knowing the Israelis were more afraid than they were.

"We tried to make ourselves calm, we would draw, we would write, we would make our mother tell us funny stories," she said. "Of course we were scared, but the Israelis were more scared.

"This makes us feel stronger, and pushes us forward."

Her 13-year-old sister Sana was keen to point out the situation for the children of Gaza is unique in comparison with children elsewhere in the world. For her, they are forced to mature beyond their years.

"We are older than our age because we have to take care of each other in these situations," she said, explaining that despite this fact, there are still psychological issues as a result.

"There are definitely psychological consequences to what has been happening to us."

"Some of my friends get so stressed because of the situation, they don't stop talking until they've completely emptied their thoughts. They just want to get rid of everything inside," she described. "Others stop talking altogether."

For Khadra, the best distraction is to write and to draw. "I write poems, and I draw," she said. "Tanks, planes in the sky, children escaping, our resistance carrying guns, these are all things we draw."

"Right now, we're making fun of the fact the Israelis were more scared than us," she said, giggling.

An abnormal situation

Mustafa El Masri, a psychiatrist who works with the World Health Organisation, said in such hostile and abnormal situations, it is important for parents and teachers to keep talking to the children, explain to them what is going on, and listen to what they have to say.

"Depending on the age of the child, parents need to explain what is going on in very honest terms, and to correct misconceptions rather than impose certain views," he said.

Follow the latest developments in the ongoing conflict


"The culture here is very advanced in the concepts of liberation, self-determination, and right to exist ... therefore, the more parents are aware of this, and transmitting this to their children, the more the children understand and can remain calm."

There are two stages of reaction after such hostilities; the biological, which focuses on self-preservation, and the "meaning-making" stage, where children attempt to digest and understand what has happened, what their role is, and why they are in such a place.

"At the moment, what we see is a 'normal' reaction towards the war, such as the inability to sleep, being afraid, and apprehensive," El Masri said. "If this persists beyond the shock stage, then it needs to be looked into professionally."

For him, the most important is that parents do not lie to their children, as this is the moment when children are attempting to build their own concepts and values.

"Children in Gaza are not naïve like children in other countries," he said. "They are very politically aware. Parents should listen to them and answer their questions, no matter how difficult."

He was keen to point out that having open discussions with children does not equate to normalising conflict and war.

"It is not normal that a person, with his children, be targeted by bombs and simply vanish," he said. "But it is normal to learn how to prevent it. What we are doing here is coping with an abnormal situation."

Omsiyat, who wants to be a journalist when she grows up, knows the experiences they have shared among themselves as children will remain with them forever.

"We think and we talk about everything else in the world, but the one thing that connects us all together is war," she said.

India: Gay Rights..!



NEW DELHI: Hundreds of gay rights activists marched through New Delhi on Sunday to demand that they be allowed to lead lives of dignity in India’s deeply conservative society.


Dozens of demonstrators carried a nearly 15-meter long, rainbow-colored banner and waved placards demanding that the government extend the scope of anti-discrimination laws to schools, workplaces and public and private spaces.


Activists said that three years after the Delhi High Court made changes in India’s colonial-era law that made gay sex a crime, homosexuals are still not socially accepted in India.

In 2009, the court had decriminalized gay sex, which until then had been an offense punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

Conservative groups have asked India’s top court to overturn the lower court’s order, and Supreme Court judges are currently hearing opinions from a range of people, including conservative groups and gay rights activists. It’s unclear when the court will make its ruling.

”If only the Supreme Court comes out on our side, and if gay marriage became legal, what could be better” said Zorian Cross, a New Delhi-based theater actor and playwright at the parade.
”Queer and loving it” and ”Give us your support” read some of the placards carried by the activists as they marched to the rhythmic beat of traditional drums and music. Other supporters distributed badges and rainbow-colored flags and scarves.

The march ended in a public meeting at Jantar Mantar, the main area for protests located in the heart of the capital, New Delhi. Many gay rights group members and their families danced and sang as drummers and musicians performed.

Vimal Kumar, an activist with a rights group called the National Alliance of Peoples’ Movements, said the government had to ensure that all forms of discrimination against gays, lesbians and transgenders was ended.

”The government has to listen. Our struggle has gone on for very long, and we are hopeful the government will listen and act on our demands,” Kumar said.

Gay rights activists are demanding that the government allow people to record the gender category of their choice in the national census, voter identity cards and all other government documents.

”We are demanding that all people be allowed to exercise their right to live their lives with dignity and freedom, regardless of their gender or sexual orientation,” said a statement issued by rights groups at the parade.

Kumar said peoples’ attitudes were gradually beginning to change and there was greater understanding among the families in urban areas as television campaigns and gay parade marches caught on. But the pace of change was slow, he said.

In some big cities, homosexuality is slowly gaining acceptance, and a few high-profile Bollywood films have dealt with gay issues.

Still, many marchers Sunday covered their faces with scarves or wore masks because they have not told their friends and families about their sexuality.

Saturday, 24 November 2012

Teen killed...!



Delhi, A man shot dead his teenage neighbour after she objected to him urinating near the gate of her New Delhi home, police have said.


Yusra Khan, 17, was killed by a 21-year-old man, described by Indian police as a "jobless vagabond", who broke into her home and also critically injured her mother.


"During the day, Yusra objected to him urinating at the gate of the building in which both lived," said additional police commissioner Ajay Chaudhry.


Mr Chaudhry said the man then returned with a handgun the same evening and shot Yusra twice and her mother in a bedroom of their working-class home in the Nizamuddin district of the city.


The man quickly disappeared through the narrow lanes of the neighbourhood, firing in the air while fleeing, according to reports.


Police have launched a major hunt to arrest the unnamed suspect.


"He is absconding but he is somewhere out there and we will get him," Mr Chaudhry said.


Yusra's father, Aslam Khan, who was not present at the time of the shooting, told journalists that the suspect left "in a fit of rage" after his daughter had raised objections and threatened her with "dire consequences".


He said his daughter "had died on the spot" while his wife was admitted to hospital and was battling for her life.


The Indian capital saw a spate of shootings in September. In one incident, a 23-year-old shot dead his ex-girlfriend and her landlady and then drove to a suburb to kill her father and sister before turning the gun on himself.


A few days later, two friends went on a shooting rampage which left three women and two young girls dead.


Figures for gun seizures in New Delhi show a rising trend.


Police in 2009 seized 573 illegal weapons, in 2010 there were 634 and in 2011 the number touched 770. In the first nine months of this year, officers have already recovered 594 guns.

http://news.sky.com/story/1015786/teen-killed-after-objecting-to-man-urinating